|
Post by rushy on Nov 21, 2014 9:06:15 GMT
Rushy I agree with most thing you've said on here but fences round pegs?!?!!? Have you been picking funny mushrooms? Are the club really that scared of telling the gypsy's to get their horses off what is not their land?? Ha ha ............... it must have been the snail flavouring in the Chub bait I was using mate .......... does make you go dizzy after a while Mind you , having said that I think I'll keep a copy of my suggestion on file
|
|
|
Post by Eddie on Nov 21, 2014 15:38:29 GMT
Dave the same thought occurred to me after walking round and seeing evidence of where anglers had roped areas off. If most of the lake could be horse free, fairly easily done, then some protected areas on the rest, would mean all banks are fishable in safety and the mud issues much improved. It doesn't have to be individual swims it could be larger areas, but both options amount to the same, safe swims to fish from, we will all keep the idea on file Dave, best not to waste good ones!
|
|
|
Post by wrighty29 on Nov 22, 2014 7:22:32 GMT
Dave the same thought occurred to me after walking round and seeing evidence of where anglers had roped areas off. If most of the lake could be horse free, fairly easily done, then some protected areas on the rest, would mean all banks are fishable in safety and the mud issues much improved. It doesn't have to be individual swims it could be larger areas, but both options amount to the same, safe swims to fish from, we will all keep the idea on file Dave, best not to waste good ones! We shouldnt have to worry about property we own being destroyed by horses we dont.
|
|
|
Post by smithleback on Nov 22, 2014 11:15:49 GMT
sounds like things are moving on,dont syndicate it tho,bad idea[bit like kippax park,paying twice not good]sort the horses,make better acess to pegs[scelpings or crushed rubble very good]am sure members will give it a go when word gets about,do it over xmas hols will give a hand myssen
|
|