|
|
Post by gedthespread on Dec 31, 2009 11:32:50 GMT
theres plenty of evidence to show that pike are capable of regulating their own population without the interference of man,as a twenty pound pike is more than capable of scoffing a five pound pike,whats the difference if an angler gets it in the pan first?Why would anybody want to eat a pike anyway?its not exactly worth eating.I would be in favour of a rule banning the removal of pike altogether and if i get chance always make anglers return fish,dont always get there in time to stop them being killed though.
|
|
bof
Full Member
Posts: 116
|
Post by bof on Jan 1, 2010 21:05:38 GMT
Err sorry Ged, but yes they are, but I guess thats not P.C. any more. There are coarse fish that dont lend themselves to eating due to an overabundance of bones, or even downright poor tasting flesh, but Pike isnt one of them. BOF  |
|
|
|
Post by gedthespread on Jan 2, 2010 14:02:37 GMT
i suppose if you know a good recipe then fair enough but it was years ago when i last tried eating a pike and it werent up to much,rather have a decent pork pie!Tried tench once and that was rubbish too.
|
|
bof
Full Member
Posts: 116
|
Post by bof on Jan 5, 2010 18:46:50 GMT
You're ahead of me there Ged, so I'll trust you on that one. But in the main I stick to the usual Trout recipes, leaving Bream, Carp, Perch, Zander, as well as Pike nowadays, to our continental cousins. BOF |
|
|
|
Post by Mart on Jan 15, 2010 17:39:46 GMT
apparently perch tastes good phil.
anything much happening down there ged i've not seen yourself or gary about in the village to ask if anythings been out.
its mart from up george street btw lol
|
|
