|
|
Post by av1nbarb3l on Aug 10, 2014 11:20:42 GMT
lets set the ball rolling to try and stop this before its too late
|
|
|
|
Post by ronny on Aug 10, 2014 12:14:59 GMT
Yep I'm in I vote against it and this post can be my signature for the petition  (Can't see the poll on my phone atm) |
|
|
|
Post by keepitreal on Aug 10, 2014 12:25:32 GMT
Possible disaster for the lower Swale fish population, not just on the Leeds waters for a quick buck.
Against.
Jon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post by ronnie on Aug 10, 2014 14:32:17 GMT
I've voted on here to see the strength of feeling on the forum but there is nothing to stop anyone adding their comments to the link that Rushy has provided. That way it's there for the council to see.
|
|
|
|
Post by kpkh on Aug 10, 2014 15:28:06 GMT
Voted against the scheme! Is there any way we could open this vote up to let non members who maybe fish below Topcliffe have a say?
|
|
|
|
Post by av1nbarb3l on Aug 10, 2014 16:02:50 GMT
the vote is open to anyone who wishes to take part all they have to do is join this forum which is not hard to do then cast a vote ive asked on west yorkshire forum for support we can only get this stopped if we have enough support strength in numbers if anyone knows of other forums that have an interest in the swale then try get them on board
|
|
|
|
Post by shaned on Aug 10, 2014 17:13:29 GMT
hi all,
I havnt been on forum for a few days & I cant believe what I,m reading? first I knew was when ronny txt me today...
I thought this hydro thing had been put on hold due to the land-owning lady refusing them a works access road across her field?? last I had heard off Geoff (the trout/worm man)
anyway, I,m shocked at possibly losing graham park, this cant happen, he appears to be the only committee member on "our level"......
needless to say, I,ve cast my vote.....AGAINST.
|
|
harry
Full Member
Posts: 170
|
Post by harry on Aug 10, 2014 17:30:09 GMT
against without a doubt
|
|
|
|
Post by gcb on Aug 10, 2014 17:59:58 GMT
Some reading
|
|
|
|
Post by av1nbarb3l on Aug 10, 2014 18:05:30 GMT
just had a text from rushy and it seems any objections to this have to be lodged by 21st August
|
|
|
|
Post by gcb on Aug 10, 2014 18:20:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by av1nbarb3l on Aug 10, 2014 18:46:15 GMT
we certainly do hope our objections count geoff rushy is trying to find out if the club have signed a legal binding contract or not
|
|
|
|
Post by JIMMY SILVERFISH FULLA on Aug 10, 2014 18:54:42 GMT
I've voted yes I don't fish rivers have no interest in bits,, only barbel,,, but any action taken by club that involves Evan 1% chance of harming a fish I'm against it,,, The club must be benefiting by 1000s right  |
|
|
|
Post by ronny on Aug 10, 2014 18:57:26 GMT
we certainly do hope our objections count geoff rushy is trying to find out if the club have signed a legal binding contract or not
Be surprised if they haven't  |
|
