|
Post by patterdalewilson on Feb 10, 2016 13:26:40 GMT
Keep up Darren the hydro scheme is toast.
|
|
|
Post by cabbo on Feb 10, 2016 15:06:40 GMT
Keep up Darren the hydro scheme is toast. Mick he his keeping up !! Leeds thought were going to benefit from the screw that's how it all started and come to light in the first place my old mate ,hence now its not going ahead no money coming from that project ,have to get it from other means now to keep the funding up for carpvale. That's the point Darren is making Mick !!
|
|
|
Post by Eddie on Feb 10, 2016 15:46:33 GMT
Moor Monkton doesn't really need any extra funding, it runs at a profit now. I think the plan is for a couple of seasons to plough that back into the place for some much needed refurbishment work, this was reflected in the buying price and was part of the original idea when the purchase was made, so it's not news. I think Graham has already said this. The future running and new rules are the issue, we need to keep it profitable while still catering for our pleasure angling members and probably day ticket anglers too! The new rules have not been passed by the delegates yet and if you have strong feelings about them, get on to your delegates, club officials etc and let them know! That way we might actually see changes that the majority want. We won't I think loose waters because of owning Moor Monkton, but run properly it can and should be a great asset to the association. We also inherited 2 years of match bookings that had to be honoured, so we are talking about its future running and the way forward after that. Great venue if commercials are your cup of tea, hope the rules that finally get passed do it justice and try to keep all anglers happy, though I'm sure that's probably impossible, so do your best Leeds!
Eddie.
|
|
|
Post by smithleback on Feb 10, 2016 20:34:53 GMT
Moor Monkton doesn't really need any extra funding, it runs at a profit now. I think the plan is for a couple of seasons to plough that back into the place for some much needed refurbishment work, this was reflected in the buying price and was part of the original idea when the purchase was made, so it's not news. I think Graham has already said this. The future running and new rules are the issue, we need to keep it profitable while still catering for our pleasure angling members and probably day ticket anglers too! The new rules have not been passed by the delegates yet and if you have strong feelings about them, get on to your delegates, club officials etc and let them know! That way we might actually see changes that the majority want. We won't I think loose waters because of owning Moor Monkton, but run properly it can and should be a great asset to the association. We also inherited 2 years of match bookings that had to be honoured, so we are talking about its future running and the way forward after that. Great venue if commercials are your cup of tea, hope the rules that finally get passed do it justice and try to keep all anglers happy, though I sure that's probably impossible, so do your best Leeds! Eddie. Well said,nice picture of toppy below weir,looking good as ever
|
|
|
Post by cabbo on Feb 10, 2016 23:05:35 GMT
Eddie I think you and Dave and Graham know how people feel about it and you said yourself in an earlier post it not fair people have paid their money and now their saying 8pm finish ,essential work yes, electronic gates really !!! .And has Dave worked out the day tickets aren't covering the petrol expences cost, and you say the new proposals have not been passed yet, how is it the match time got decide to go from 6hrs to 5hrs but a certain few wasn't to happy about that now its been agreed to go back to 6hrs that seems to have been decided and quick !!! And your right if its run properly it would work but its got to be run for its members and not just a certain few . Your a delegate my old mate so do your best !! Wish you all the best buddy . Cabbo
|
|
|
Post by rushy on Feb 11, 2016 8:48:52 GMT
I'm all Moor Monktoned Out at the moment but if you think about the Delegate system it is not actually working as it should do. The idea is that things get brought up at one delegates meeting and the delegates should then take it back to their members to ask what they think. They then go back to the next delegates meeting and vote based on their members views. In a lot of cases , something gets brought up at the delegates , discussions take place and then a vote is taken there and then. So it's not the wishes of the members that is being considered but the wishes of 30 or so delegates All the best Dave R
|
|
|
Post by cabbo on Feb 11, 2016 19:55:52 GMT
I'm all Moor Monktoned Out at the moment but if you think about the Delegate system it is not actually working as it should do. The idea is that things get brought up at one delegates meeting and the delegates should then take it back to their members to ask what they think. They then go back to the next delegates meeting and vote based on their members views. In a lot of cases , something gets brought up at the delegates , discussions take place and then a vote is taken there and then. So it's not the wishes of the members that is being considered but the wishes of 30 or so delegates All the best Dave R Well they you have it ,thanks for that bit of info Dave . That's me finished with moor monkton for now
|
|
|
Post by neptune on Feb 22, 2016 23:00:09 GMT
I'm all Moor Monktoned Out at the moment but if you think about the Delegate system it is not actually working as it should do. The idea is that things get brought up at one delegates meeting and the delegates should then take it back to their members to ask what they think. They then go back to the next delegates meeting and vote based on their members views. In a lot of cases , something gets brought up at the delegates , discussions take place and then a vote is taken there and then. So it's not the wishes of the members that is being considered but the wishes of 30 or so delegates All the best Dave R If what Rushy is saying is the case then surely, the committee need to re visit this as it cannot conduct the clubs business in this way. Can someone from the committee state where we are at with this. Regards. Neptune
|
|